The work was carried out by a Chinese contractor, for a building owner who was a blacksmith, and was completed about the middle of February 1901. In the case of new buildings, a certificate must be issued before they can be occupied, but there is no such requirement in the case of buildings which have merely been altered or added to, provided the extent of such operations is not so great as to bring them within the definition of "new buildings" as contained in the Ordinance.
Hence, no certificate was required in the case of the houses now under consideration.
The ground floor of No. 1232 was occupied by a blacksmith who carried out his business there, and No. 1234 by a building contractor who stored a quantity of timber in the cockloft or intermediate floor upon the upper floors of both walls. The buildings were used as dwellings.
The collapse recurred on the night of the 14th August 1901, at about 10:45, an hour at which most of the occupants would be indoors, and the disaster was aggravated by an outbreak of fire at No. 1232.
Page 2
sec 53 of was amended by 25 / 1891
sec 14 of 72.
as amended
no ce contained in the Ordinance.
The 72.
od 25 / 1891
was reordered and rewritten to:Sec 53 of Ordinance 72 as amended by Ordinance 25/1891
and the final output isThe work was carried out by a Chinese contractor, for a building owner who was a blacksmith, and was completed about the middle of February 1901. In the case of new buildings, a certificate must be issued before they can be occupied, but there is no such requirement in the case of buildings which have merely been altered or added to, provided the extent of such operations is not so great as to bring them within the definition of "new buildings" as contained in the Ordinance.
Hence, no certificate was required in the case of the houses now under consideration.
The ground floor of No. 1232 was occupied by a blacksmith who carried out his business there, and No. 1234 by a building contractor who stored a quantity of timber in the cockloft or intermediate floor upon the upper floors of both walls. The buildings were used as dwellings.
The collapse recurred on the night of the 14th August 1901, at about 10:45, an hour at which most of the occupants would be indoors, and the disaster was aggravated by an outbreak of fire at No. 1232.
Sec 53 of Ordinance 72 as amended by Ordinance 25/1891
الاروند
2.
*
A
222
sec 53 of
was carried out by a chinese bon
the Ocover who was a
-tractor, for
completed
a bhemaman, & was about the middle of February 19ot In the ea si
new building
certificate must be issued befor they can be occupied, but there is no such requirement in the case of buildings which have merclyban W 15 of 1889 altered or added to, provided the I see also extent of such operations is not 20 great as to bring them within the by definition of "new beuditings" us
The 72.
asmended
sec 14 of
od 25 / 1891
no ce
contained in the Ordinance. Hince
certificate
f
was required in the the houses now under.
consideration.
The ground floor of 11832 was inspeed this Blacksmith whe
carried out his business there and of 1234 by a building contractor who stated a quantity of timber in
cockloft
t or intermediate floor
a
upon
supported into the side or
laus
parte
extend in
upper floors of booty walls. The be exfered as dwellings.
the collapse recurred on the night of the 14
10:46
فر
August 1901 aben an hour at which most
of the occupants would be indoors,
and the disaster was
Lay
aggravated
outbreak of firbeu 1232
2.
ca u Tet
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.